July 12 2023 0Comment

AI in IP: Combating The Grey Areas

As a young entrepreneur, many are fascinated by the advancements in technology. They are especially interested in artificial intelligence (AI) and how it could revolutionize the business world. Many opt to own an AI company, which would help businesses automate their processes and improve efficiency.

However, while delving deeper into AI, grey areas of the intellectual property (IP) law are arising. The primary concerns include the following:

  • the ownership of the rights to the data that AI collects 
  • The procedure to protect the AI algorithms from being an infringement 

These were just a few of the questions, and there are more, which are increasing with preceding time.

In the present world, one must proactively protect the company’s IP. This can be begun by researching the different types of IP protection available, such as patents, trademarks, and copyrights, or you may also consult with the IPR lawyers to ensure that the company’s IP is protected in every manner.

But even with these measures in place, one has to remember that risks were still involved. There are instances of companies being sued for using AI algorithms that were too similar to those created by their competitors.

To mitigate these risks, it is necessary to take a proactive approach to IP ethics, such as; ensuring that the company’s AI algorithms were created ethically, with no plagiarism or copying of others’ work. It is also critical to note that the company’s AI was transparent, clearly explaining how it functioned and what data it collected.

By taking these steps, you can navigate the grey areas of IP law and ensure that the company’s AI is both innovative and ethical. 

AI and Copyright

We are sharing some industry insights and analysis on the intersection of AI and copyright. As AI technologies advance, many questions surround how copyright law will apply to AI-generated works. 

One of the key issues is determining who owns the copyright to AI-generated works. Currently, copyright law attributes authorship to human creators, but as AI becomes more sophisticated, it’s possible that machines could create original works that are protected by copyright. 

Another concern is how AI technologies will impact how we consume and distribute copyrighted works. For example, AI-powered content recognition tools are already being used to identify and remove infringing content from the internet. However, there are also concerns that these tools could be used to overzealously police content and stifle creativity. 

Overall, the intersection of AI and copyright is a complex and evolving area of law. As AI advances, it will be necessary for lawmakers and industry leaders to work together to ensure that copyright law keeps pace with new technologies. 

Originality is a prerequisite for copyright protection. Copyright protection is contingent upon originality. Only when a work is original—it hasn’t been duplicated from another—is it given protection. The work is not even necessary to express a notion in a novel way. For an expression to be considered original, only one thing must be true: it must not be plagiarised. Therefore, the author should independently write the piece. 

Section 2(d) of the Copyright Act of 1957 is a section that calls into question the copyright protection of works created by AI systems. ‘Author’ is defined in this section. The person must be an “author” to be the proprietor of any copyrighted work. AI is challenging because they are typically not viewed as legal persons. 

“Author” is defined in Section 2(d) as the person who “causes the creation of any literary, dramatic, musical, or artistic work which is computer generated”; The term “the person who causes the work to be created” poses a challenge to this notion. 

The term “the person who causes the work to be created” challenges this notion. A person must be close to the work to create it; for this act, “person” might refer to either a natural person or a legal person. The current Copyright Act does not cover AI systems. Therefore, under Indian Copyright Laws, the authorship of works produced by AI would be ambiguous.

AI and Trademark

As we dive deeper into the world of AI, it’s essential to consider how it’s affecting trademark law. AI-powered systems are becoming increasingly adept at generating content and creating products, which raises questions about who owns intellectual property rights. 

The issue becomes even more complex when considering that AI can create things similar to existing trademarks, potentially leading to infringement claims. Businesses must be proactive in trademark registration and monitoring to avoid legal issues down the line.

Additionally, AI analyses trademark data, providing valuable insights into the market and consumer behaviour. This can help businesses make informed decisions about branding and marketing strategies.

While AI presents challenges and opportunities for trademark law and analysis, staying informed and adapting to the changing landscape is essential. 

AI and Patent 

It’s an exciting topic that’s been gaining traction lately. AI can potentially revolutionize the patent industry, but there are also some challenges.

On the one hand, AI can help with patent searching and analysis. With its ability to quickly process large amounts of data, AI can identify relevant patents and help patent attorneys make more informed decisions. AI can also help with patent drafting by analyzing and suggesting new patents.

On the other hand, there are concerns about AI-generated patents. With AI becoming more advanced, it could start creating patents. This raises questions about who owns the patents and how they should be regulated. 

Overall, it’s an exciting time for the patent industry. AI can bring about significant changes, but it’s essential to consider the challenges and potential ethical issues. 

Since the Patents Act of 1970’s Section 2(y) does not declare that the “true and first inventor” must be a human, it can be assumed to be opening the door for the inclusion of works created by AI systems. However, because terms like “person interested” and “patentee” include definitions that specify that it must be a person (a legal entity), it is clear that the legislature intended the act’s overall goal to benefit people and other legal entities. Therefore, these laws must be changed to meet the needs of an evolving society and scientific systems. 

Indian IP law regulating AI

As AI technology advances, Indian IP law in AI is becoming an increasingly important topic. One of the critical issues that must be addressed is how to protect intellectual property rights for AI-generated work. While there are still many questions to be answered, it’s clear that a proactive approach is necessary to ensure that the rights of all parties involved are respected. We can help shape a brighter future for AI innovation and creativity by staying on top of industry trends and legal developments.


Write a Reply or Comment